Volume 3, Issue 8 (11-2025)
JORS 2025, 3(8): 55-40 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hashempour P, mirzamohammadi P, rahbar B. The Relationship between Language and Architecture within Cultural Context (A Case Study of Azerbaijani Turkish and the Traditional Houses of Tabriz). , JORS. 2025; 3 (8) : 5
URL: http://jors-sj.com/article-1-94-en.html
URL: http://jors-sj.com/article-1-94-en.html
1- Tabriz University of Islamic Arts, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts
2- Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran
2- Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran
Abstract: (1345 Views)
Problem Statement:In interdisciplinary studies, the linkage between language—as intangible heritage—and architecture—as tangible heritage—represents a critical missing link in revitalizing a connection that modernization processes have placed at risk of being forgotten. The mechanism that renders linguistic concepts from the mental and linguistic world of a culture into the physical form of architecture has not yet been systematically defined. This study, focusing on the cultural context of Azerbaijan, seeks to uncover this mechanism and present a nationally applicable model.
Research Question: How are the cultural metaphors of the Azerbaijani Turkish language (Tabriz dialect) manifested in the traditional Qajar-era houses of Tabriz?
Purpose: The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the relationship between language and architecture in Iranian culture. By analyzing Turkish language metaphors and correlating them with the traditional houses of Tabriz, the research proposes a conceptual model with the potential for application across other cultural contexts within Iran.
Methodology: This research adopts a qualitative approach through a case study strategy. Data collection employed documentary methods and content analysis of cultural texts (folklore, bayati poems, and dictionaries) to extract linguistic concepts, along with field surveys and architectural map analysis to examine case examples. Final data interpretation combined descriptive–analytical and interpretive–historical methods to connect abstract concepts with their physical forms.
Findings and Conclusion: The study reveals that traditional Qajar-era houses in Tabriz embody a coherent worldview shaped by a complex cognitive–cultural process. The results confirm that this process can be systematically analyzed through the conceptual model “Mental World (Origin) → Language (Path) → Architecture (Destination)”. In this framework, fundamental beliefs and social norms (origin domain) are manifested through the cultural metaphors of Azerbaijani Turkish (path domain) and serve as guiding maps for architects and builders to materialize these concepts in physical elements, decorative details, and spatial relationships. Simultaneously, these concepts act as a semantic and behavioral framework for residents—structuring daily behavioral patterns and social interactions within architectural space.
The main achievement of this study is the introduction of an analytical–applied model that demonstrates how intangible heritage (language) transforms into tangible heritage (architecture). A key insight is the identification of a cyclical and dynamic relationship between language and architecture; metaphors such as “The guest is God” have led to the creation of grand, elaborately detailed tambi (central reception halls) in Tabriz houses, while the lived experience of hosting and interaction within these spaces perpetuates and reinforces hospitality values across generations. Thus, architecture moves beyond passive representation to become an active vehicle for cultural transmission.
By transcending purely formal or phenomenological approaches and employing cultural metaphors as an analytical tool, the study offers a deeper perspective than purely anthropological analyses. The presented model provides a basis for testing in other Iranian cultural–linguistic contexts (e.g., Kurdish, Persian) and for diverse building typologies (e.g., bazaars, mosques). This framework holds significant practical implications for developing culturally oriented design guidelines in urban regeneration projects, reinforcing the integration of form, meaning, language, and culture in contemporary Iranian architecture, and fostering the creation of new works rooted in identity and meaning.
Research Question: How are the cultural metaphors of the Azerbaijani Turkish language (Tabriz dialect) manifested in the traditional Qajar-era houses of Tabriz?
Purpose: The primary objective of this study is to elucidate the relationship between language and architecture in Iranian culture. By analyzing Turkish language metaphors and correlating them with the traditional houses of Tabriz, the research proposes a conceptual model with the potential for application across other cultural contexts within Iran.
Methodology: This research adopts a qualitative approach through a case study strategy. Data collection employed documentary methods and content analysis of cultural texts (folklore, bayati poems, and dictionaries) to extract linguistic concepts, along with field surveys and architectural map analysis to examine case examples. Final data interpretation combined descriptive–analytical and interpretive–historical methods to connect abstract concepts with their physical forms.
Findings and Conclusion: The study reveals that traditional Qajar-era houses in Tabriz embody a coherent worldview shaped by a complex cognitive–cultural process. The results confirm that this process can be systematically analyzed through the conceptual model “Mental World (Origin) → Language (Path) → Architecture (Destination)”. In this framework, fundamental beliefs and social norms (origin domain) are manifested through the cultural metaphors of Azerbaijani Turkish (path domain) and serve as guiding maps for architects and builders to materialize these concepts in physical elements, decorative details, and spatial relationships. Simultaneously, these concepts act as a semantic and behavioral framework for residents—structuring daily behavioral patterns and social interactions within architectural space.
The main achievement of this study is the introduction of an analytical–applied model that demonstrates how intangible heritage (language) transforms into tangible heritage (architecture). A key insight is the identification of a cyclical and dynamic relationship between language and architecture; metaphors such as “The guest is God” have led to the creation of grand, elaborately detailed tambi (central reception halls) in Tabriz houses, while the lived experience of hosting and interaction within these spaces perpetuates and reinforces hospitality values across generations. Thus, architecture moves beyond passive representation to become an active vehicle for cultural transmission.
By transcending purely formal or phenomenological approaches and employing cultural metaphors as an analytical tool, the study offers a deeper perspective than purely anthropological analyses. The presented model provides a basis for testing in other Iranian cultural–linguistic contexts (e.g., Kurdish, Persian) and for diverse building typologies (e.g., bazaars, mosques). This framework holds significant practical implications for developing culturally oriented design guidelines in urban regeneration projects, reinforcing the integration of form, meaning, language, and culture in contemporary Iranian architecture, and fostering the creation of new works rooted in identity and meaning.
Article number: 5
Editorial: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2025/09/30 | Accepted: 2025/10/28 | Published: 2025/11/22
Received: 2025/09/30 | Accepted: 2025/10/28 | Published: 2025/11/22
References
1. ابوضیا، فرهاد؛ و قزلباش، محمدرضا. (1364) .الفبای کالبد خانه سنتی یزد. وزارت برنامه و بودجه.
2. براتی، ناصر. (1382). بازشناسی مفهوم خانه در زبان فارسی و فرهنگ ایرانی. خیال، -(8)، 25-25. https://sid.ir/paper/451257/fa
3. بلخاری قهی، حسن. (1388). مبانی عرفانی هنر و معماری اسلامی. سوره مهر.
4. جمالی، سیروس؛ و خندانی، نادیا. (1399). مطالعه تطبیقی ساختار کالبدی خانههای سنتی دوره قاجار (نمونه موردی: شهر تهران و تبریز). شباک، 6(4)، 143-154.
5. خستو، مریم؛ و حبیب، فرح. (1395). رویکردی تحلیلی به تأثیر کالبد شهر بر فرهنگ با تأکید بر بافت شهری (مطالعة موردی: شهر قزوین). فصلنامۀ شهر ایرانی اسلامی، 26، 42-31.
6. دوستی، حسین (1397)، بایاتی؛ آذربایجان آغیز ادبیاتی (جلد 1و2). انتشارات محقق اردبیلی
7. زیاری، کرامتالله؛ پرهیز، فریاد؛ مهدنژاد، حافظ؛ و اشتری، حسن. (۱۳۸۹). ارزیابی مسکن گروههای درآمدی و ارائه برنامه تأمین مسکن اقشار کمدرآمد (نمونه موردی: استان لرستان). پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی، (۷۴)، ۱-۲۱. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20120426162258-5110-43.pdf
8. صدیق سروستانی، رحمتاله؛ و نیمروزی، نوروزی. (1389). بررسی ارتباط بین مشارکت در روابط همسایگی و احساس امنیت در محلات شهر مشهد. فصلنامه دانش انتظامی، 12(2)، 185-220.
9. قربانی، جاوید. (۱۳۹۰). آتالار سوزو: ضربالمثلهای رایج در شهرستان خدابنده. دانش.
10. کبیرصابر، محمدباقر. (1394). مقاله غیرسبک شناسی: مفهوم شناسی واژه «سازه» در گفتمان معماری معاصر ایران. مجله سبک شناسی نظم و نثر فارسی (بهار ادب)، 8(27)، 393-404. magiran.com/p1418608
11. کیانی، داوود (1397)، بایاتی؛ آذربایجان آغیز ادبیاتی (جلد 1 و 2). انتشارات محقق اردبیلی. . https://ketabesabz.com/dl/81644
12. محمداف، بلبل. (۱۳۷۰). آذربایجان فولکلوریک ماهنیلاری (حسین فضلالهی اولدوز، مترجم، جلد 1 و 2). انتشارات مهران.
13. مرادی، ساسان؛ متین، مهرداد؛ فیاض، ریما؛ و دهباشیشریف، مزین. (1397). گونهشناسی خانههای سنتی حیاطدار تبریز بر اساس معیارهای کالبدی مؤثر بر عملکرد اقلیمی (حیاط مرکزی). مدیریت شهری، 17(51)، 87-105.
14. مشکور، محمدجواد. (1375). نظری به تاریخ آذربایجان و آثار باستانی و جمعیتشناسی آن. انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی.
15. معماریان، غلامحسین. (1391). معماری ایرانی نیارش. تهران: نغمه نواندیش.
16. هیئت، جواد. (1365). سیری در تاریخ زبان و لهجههای ترکی. نشر نو.
17. Barati, N., Nikpeyma, M., & Alizadeh Mollayosuf, S. (2021). The space of language (Language as a determining factor in the definition and perception of space). Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(1), 1-22. http://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2021.17647.1567
18. Balilan Asl, L. (2014). The study of spatial structure of Tabriz city in the Qajar era, based on the historical maps. Journal of Iranian Islamic Period History, 5(8), 33-55.
19. Barati, N. (2008). An introduction to the theory of the role of local language in the reading and perceiving space and human environment: Case study of Persian language. Bagh-e Nazar, 5(10), 3-16.
20. Barati, N. (2015). Semiotic-cultural Definition of "Place" (Case Study: Persian Language). Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 3(8), 3-10.
21. Belali Oskui, A., & Nazari, S. (2020). Desirable values of housing design from the perspective of Islamic thought (a step towards explaining the Iranian Islamic model of housing). Iranian Pattern of Progress, 8(1), 299-345. [DOI:20.1001.1.23225645.1399.8.1.12.2]
22. Davies, W. K. D., & Herbert, D. T. (1993). Communities within cities: An urban social geography. London: Belhaven Press. Faramarz Gharamaleki, A. (2013). Methodology of religious studies. Razavi University of Islamic Sciences Publication
23. Firuzabadi, M. (1410) Al-Qamus Al-Muhit. [Al-Muhit Dictionary]. Arab Heritage Revival House
24. Fischer, G. (1991). Architektur und Sprache: Grundlagen des architektonischen Ausdruckssystems. [Architecture and Language: Foundations of the Architectural System of Expression]. Shaker Verlag. [In German]
25. Frank, R. M. (2015). A future agenda for research on language and culture. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 493-512). London: Routledge.
26. Gobineau, A. (1999). Trois ans en Asie: de 1855 à 1858 (A. Houshang Mahdavi, Trans.). [Three years in Asia: from 1855 to 1858]. Qatreh. (Original work published 1923)
27. Hadi, I. (2007). Dil Deniz Luğatnamei Camei Etimolojik Etimolojik Sözlüğü. [The Sea of Languages: An Etymological Dictionary of Turkish]. Akhtar.
28. Kashgari, M. (2004). Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk (H. Mohammadzadeh Sediq, Trans.). [Compendium of the Turkic Dialects]. Akhtar. (Original work published 1074)
29. Khamenehzadeh, H. (2017). An Introduction to the Concept of Privacy and How it is Realized in the House Life-World1 Comparative Study in Pre-modern and Modern Iranian Houses. Bagh-e Nazar, 14(49), 33-44. [DOI:10.12987/9780300154177-002]
30. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
31. Lakawa, A. R. (2015). The relationship between language and architecture: A case study of Betawi cultural village at Setu Babakan, South Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 5(8), 84-92. https://oasisip.org.uk/Files/Posts/Portal1/language%20and%20architecture(1).pdf
32. Leuckert, S. (2022). [Review of the book Cultural Linguistics and World Englishes. English World-Wide by S. Sadeghpour & F. Sharifian]. Journal of Varieties of English, 43(3). [DOI:10.1075/eww.22002.leu]
33. Memarian, G. H., Hashemi Toghr Oljerdi, S. M., & Kamalipour, H. (2010). The Impact of Religious Culture on Organization of Houses. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 3(2), 1-25. [DOI:10.7508/ijcr.2010.10.001]
34. Mohamad Hoseini, P., Javan Foruzandeh, A., Jahani Dolatabad, E., & Heidari, A. A. (2021). Analysis of the role of cultural choices in shaping the structure of vernacular houses (Case study: Ardabil houses in late Qajar and Pahlavi first). Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture. 8(4), 61-84.
35. Naqibi, S. A. Q., & Zamani, Z. (2011). The part of Loyalty in Family relying and its development strategies with the reference to the Quranic verses (Ayat) and Hadiths (Riwayat). Women's Strategic Studies, 13(52), 7-53. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20082827.1390.13.52.2.3
36. Orsolle, E. (2003). Le Caucase et la Perse (A. A. Saeidi, Trans.). [The Caucasus and Persia]. Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. (Original work published 1885)
37. Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. University of Texas Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Toward_a_Theory_of_Cultural_Linguistics.html?id=8dWFA2xtklYC
38. Rahravi, S., Valibeig, N., Dehghan, N., & Masoud, M. (2019). Analysis of the Formal Features of Chaharsofe Houses and its Influence on the Formal Structure of Introverted Houses in the City of Isfahan. Bagh-e Nazar, 16(72), 5-20. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2019.87455]
39. Rapoport, A. (2003). Culture, Architecture and Design. London: Locke Science Publishing.
40. Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. John Benjamins Publishing. [DOI:10.1075/clscc.1]
41. Sharifian, F. (2013). Cultural Conceptualisations in Learning English as an L2: Examples from Persian-speaking Learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 90-116. https://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir/article_20455.html
42. Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. John Benjamins Publishing. [DOI:10.1075/clscc.8]
43. Sheil, M. L. W. (1989). Glimpses of life and manners in Persia (H. Aboutorabian, Trans.). Nou Publication. (Original work published 1856)
44. Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139167000]
46. Tavşan, C., & Akbarzadeh, N. (2018). The effect of language patterns on architectural forms (From the perspective of semiotics on Zaha Hadid's works). Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1). [DOI:10.1080/23311886.2018.1507085]
47. T.D.K sözlükleri. (n.d.). Azerbaycan Türkçesi. Retrieved from https://sozluk.gov.tr
48. Ter-Minasova, S.G. (2000) Language and Intercultural Communication. SLOVO, Moscow, 624 p.
49. Valizadeh Oghani, M. (2019). An Analysis of the Manifestation of Ethical & Legal Ideas in Architectural Design of Iranian Traditional Houses. Urban Management, 17(53), 27-44.
50. Varmaghani, H., & Soltanzade, H. (2018). The Role of Gender and Livelihood Culture in Forming House (Comparing the Qajar's Houses of Gilan and Bushehr). Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(23), 123-134.
51. Waithe, M. (2006). William Morris's Utopia of Strangers: Victorian Medievalism and the Ideal of Hospitality (NED-New edition). Boydell & Brewer. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.ctt1f89sjx [DOI:10.1515/9781846155123]
52. Weber, M. (1922) Economy and Society. University of California Press, Berkeley. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1807996
53. Wilber, N. D. (1969). Persian gardens and garden pavilions (M. Dokhtesaba, Trans.). Book translation and publishing company. (Original work published 1962)
54. Yazdanfar A, Hoseini B, Zaroodi M. (2013). Public spaces and social interactions enhancement (Case study: Kosar residential complex and Ekbatan residential complex-phase 2). International Journal of Urban and Rural Management, 11(32), 7-22.
55. Pour Mehdi Ghayem Maghami, H. (2017). Rethinking Architecture Language in Relation to Existence Language. Architecture in hot and dry climate, 5(5), 83-100. [DOI:10.29252/smb.5.5.83]
56. Hasani, K., & Nourouzborazjani, V. (2018). A Specification of a New Pattern of Shape Grammar in Architecture of Today's houses; Case study: Qajar houses in Tabriz and Tehran. Bagh-e Nazar, 15(63), 29-40. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2018.67365]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |