Volume 3, Issue 7 (8-2025)                   JORS 2025, 3(7): 20-33 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahmanpour Zanjani A, kalami M. Investigating the physical and functional impacts of downtown development plans on its surrounding historical context Study case: Sabzeh-e-Meydan, Zanjan. , JORS. 2025; 3 (7) : 3
URL: http://jors-sj.com/article-1-99-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Zanjan University., rahmanpour@znu.ac.ir
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Zanjan University
Abstract:   (1937 Views)
Statement of the problem: The historical contexts of Iranian cities, especially in urban centers, face challenges such as physical deterioration and functional changes. City center development programs are implemented with the aim of improving the quality of public spaces and strengthening urban functions, but some cause disruption in the historical structure and reduce the social cohesion of neighborhoods. This research aims to investigate the effects of the Sabzeh-e-Meydan Zanjan development program in two physical and functional dimensions on the structure of the historical center and its surrounding context.
Research method: The research method is descriptive-analytical and based on a case study. Data collection was carried out using library resources, documents, and development programs, along with field visits and observing people's behavior, and the information obtained was examined using content analysis and logical reasoning.
Findings: The findings of the Zanjan Sabzeh-Meydan project study show that although this plan has increased presence, social interactions, and improved the quality of urban space, it has weakened the historical hierarchy, neighborhood centers, and micro-collective spaces by creating integrated spaces instead of a micro-neighborhood network. The reduction in the diversity of social, commercial, and religious uses at the neighborhood level and the transfer of activities to the city center have resulted in functional concentration and a decline in neighborhood life, disrupting local access, reducing security, and increasing non-local users. However, interventions in the southern part, such as sidewalk construction and revitalization of Sabzeh-Meydan, have improved urban access and strengthened visual communication, enhancing presence and social activities on a trans-neighborhood scale.
Conclusion: The results of the study emphasize that the success of development programs in historical contexts requires a balance between physical and functional considerations, maintaining neighborhood social ties, and enhancing the quality of life. This study shows that place-based interventions and attention to spatial development components can help maintain the integrity of the historical context while improving urban performance.
Article number: 3
Full-Text [PDF 3558 kb]   (788 Downloads)    
Editorial: Original Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/10/4 | Accepted: 2025/11/11 | Published: 2025/11/12

References
1. شرکت مهندسین مشاور ساباط طرح آرا. (1401). مطالعه، مرمت و حفاظت بافت‌هعای تاریخی. طرح پژوهشی درون سازمانی. اداره کل میراث فرهنگی، گردشگری و صنایع دستی استان زنجان.
2. ازکیا، مصطفی و غفاری، غلامرضا. (1393). جامعه‌شناسی توسعه (ویراست دوم).کیهان.
3. الماسی، مهدی. (1403). مرمت و بازسازی بافت تاریخی سبزه‌میدان زنجان. مهر نیوز. https://mehrnews.com/x35Kjs.
4. پاکزاد، جهانشاه. (1386). راهنمای طراحی فضاهای شهری در ایران (ح. اسدی‌خوانساری، ویراست.). دبیرخانه شورای عالی شهرسازی و معماری ایران. انتشارات شهیدی.
5. توسلی، محمود. (1390). طراحی شهری هنر نو کردن ساختار شهر: همراه با چهار نمونه موردی. خانۀ چاپ و طرح.
6. حبیبی، سید محسن. (1382). چگونگی الگوپذیری و تجدید سازمان استخوانبندی محله. هنرهای زیبا، (13)13. 32-39.
7. Abarghouei Fard, H. & Mansouri, S. A. (2021). Reviewing the Constituent Components of the Spatial Organization of Iranian City after Islam in the 9th-14th AH Travelogues. MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape, 13(55), 20-29. https:doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2021.240065.2070
8. Abarghouei Fard, H., Boroumand, H., Tayefeh Hosseinlou, A., Latifi, S. M. M., Nabaei, S., & Nickzad, G. (2020). Collective Space, A Declining Concept Assessing the Social Quality of Urban Spaces in the Historic District of Gorgan. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 8(28), 23-32. https:doi.org/10.22034/jaco.2020.217608.1139
9. Abarghouei Fard, H., Motalebi, G., & Mansouri, S. A. (2023). "A theory of Good Form of Public Space" A Critical Review of the Criteria for the Formation of Efficient Public Space. Bagh-e Nazar, 20(121), 37-54. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2023.382820.5325]
10. Andalib, A. (2024). Pathology of Revitalizing Deteriorated Urban Fabrics in Iran from the Perspective of BalancedRenovation theory. Journal of Revitalization School, 1(1), 44-51. http://jors-sj.com/article-1-25-en.html
11. Apter, D. E. (1967). The Politics Of Modernization. University of Chicago Press.
12. Barrett, H. (1996). Townscape change and local planning management in city centre conservation areas: the example of Birmingham and Bristol [Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham].
13. Carmona, M. (2010). Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Routledge.
14. Carr, S., Francis, M., Rilvin, L. G. & Stone, A. M. (1993). Public space. Cambridge university press.
15. Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & place, 14(3), 544-561. [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007]
16. Dehnad, N., Mahdinejad, J., & Karimi, B. (2021). Explaining the relationship between the components affecting the quality of collective open space in promoting the sociability of the environment. Motaleate Shahri, 10(37), 45-56. doi: 10.34785/J011.2021.519
17. falahat, M. S., & Garshasbi, N. (2024). The Two-Way Framework between Cultural Landscape and Urban Regeneration. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 29(3), 57-71. [DOI:10.22059/jfaup.2025.387450.673036]
18. Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482-485. [DOI:10.1080/01944369308975902]
19. Gehl, J.(2013). Cities for people. Washington: Island press. [DOI:10.2307/jj.41003893]
20. ICOMOS. (1994). Nara Document on Authenticity. Retrieved on March 17, 2016. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020-05/convern8_06_thenaradocu_ing.pdf
21. Jacobs, J (2007). The Death and Life of Great American Cities (H. Parsi, A. Aflatooni, Trans.). University of Tehran Press. (Original published 1961)
22. Lynch, K. A. (1994). The Image of the City (M. Mozayani, Trans.). University of Tehran Press. (Original work published 1960)
23. Mansouri, S. A. (2007). The Spatial Organization of Iranian City in Two Periods: Before and After Islam Based on the Evidences of Kerman City Evolution. Bagh-e Nazar, 4(7), 50-60.
24. Mansouri, S. A. (2023). The Ratio of Development to the Territorial Concept. MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of landscape, 15(64), 3-3. http://doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2023.180070
25. Mansouri, S. A., Mokhles, F., Hemmati, M., Abarghuifard, H., & Mohammadzadeh, Sh. (2020). The spatial system of iranian city in the islamic period. Nazar Research Center.
26. Mardomi, K., & Ghamari, H. (2012). Architectural Requirements for improvement of Sociopetaloid spaces in Metro Stations spaces. Urban Management, 9(27). https://www.magiran.com/p949695
27. Mokhles, F. (2017). The Muti-Nucleus Structure of Moroccan Medinas. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 5(16), 15-22.
28. Montello, D. R. (2007). The Contribution of Space Syntax to a Comprehensive Theory of Environmental Psychology. Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. İstanbul, Turkey. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:145316716
29. Morin, E. (2003). L'humanité de l'humanité : l'identité humaine [The humanity of humanity: human identity] (A. Nikpey, F. Mohammadi, Tran.). Ghasidehsara. (Original work published 2003)
30. Najjari Nabi, R., & Mehdinezhad, J. (2020). Evaluating the Role of Physical and Functional Factors in the Socialization of Traditional Iranian Markets Using Space Syntax Technique (Case Study: Tabriz Bazaar). Bagh-e Nazar, 17(85), 67-82. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2020.182777.4088]
31. Nazif, H. & Motalebi, G. (2019). Developing a Conceptual Model of Legibility Relying on Mental Imagination. Bagh-e Nazar, 16(78), 69-76. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2019.187359.4156]
32. Pourahmad, A., Hamidi, A., Hataminejad, H., & Zanganeh, S. (2023). Review and Qualitative Content Analysis of the Theoretical Origins of Urban Regeneration. Iranian-Islamic City, 13(47), 1-17. https://iic.ihss.ac.ir/en/Article/39972/FullText
33. Pourhosseini, Z., Pahlavan, P., & Hoseinzadeh, M. (2024). Intentional Destruction of Historical Buildings: The CombinedApplication of Infill Design and Reconstruction in Response to Demolished Sections. Journal of Revitalization School, 2(4), 22-31. [DOI:10.22034/2.4.22]
34. Rabie, M. (2016), A Theory of Sustainable Sociocultural and Economic evelopment. Palgrave Macmillan New York. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-137-57952-2]
35. Rishbeth, C. (2001). Ethnic Minority Groups and the Design of Public Open Space: An inclusive landscape? Landscape Research, 26(4), 351-366. [DOI:10.1080/01426390120090148]
36. Rupp, L. A., Zimmerman, M. A., Sly, K. W., Reischl, T. M., Thulin, E. J., Wyatt, T. A., & Stock, J. J. P. (2020). Community-Engaged Neighborhood Revitalization and Empowerment: Busy Streets Theory in Action. American journal of community psychology, 65(1-2), 90-106. [DOI:10.1002/ajcp.12358]
37. Saremi, A. (2010). weaving. in and out and STILL…. Century of Architectural Art (affiliated with the Century of Architectural Art Cultural Institute)
38. Setayeshmehr, M., Nasekhian, S., & Valibeig, N. (2022). Comparing Urban Conservation and Urban Regeneration in the Field of Change Process (from the Perspective of Contemporary Scholars). Bagh-e Nazar, 19(112), 67-80. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2022.313140.503]
39. Sivaev, D. (2015). What Makes a Good City Strategy?: Competitive Cities for Jobs and Growth. Companion Paper, 8. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23567 [DOI:10.1596/23567]
40. Stone, C. N., & Sanders, H. T. (Eds.). (1987). The politics of urban development. University Press of Kansas.
41. Strong, N. (2007). Reviving Community Identity using Movement in and through Public Space [Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee]. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/215
42. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2009). Economic development. Pearson education.
43. Zhong, X., & Chen, X. (2017). Demolition, rehabilitation, and conservation: heritage in Shanghai's urban regeneration, 1990-2015. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41(2), 82-91. [DOI:10.3846/20297955.2017.1294120]
44. Lotfi, S., Sholeh, M. , Hajipoor, K., Jangjoo, S., & Fallah Manshadi, A. (2022). Event-Led Regeneration in Reconnecting the Ritual-Religious Structure of Historic Cities (Case Study: Inter-Connected Structure of Historic Shiraz). Geography and Urban Space Development, 9(3), 171-193. [DOI:10.22067/jgusd.2022.47725.0]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.