Volume 2, Issue 2 (6-2024)
JORS 2024, 2(2): 44-57 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sad Berenji S, Moazen S. Adaptive Reuse of Historical Churches: An Analysis of Eight Case Studies. , JORS. 2024; 2 (2) :44-57
URL: http://jors-sj.com/article-1-35-en.html
URL: http://jors-sj.com/article-1-35-en.html
1- Ph.D. in Landscape Architecture,Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Conservation Department ,School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology,Tehran ,Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Conservation Department ,School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology,Tehran ,Iran
Abstract: (4467 Views)
Shifting the museum-like perspective on historical buildings towards their adaptive reuse that plays a role in the urban fabric contributes to their preservation and longevity. The study and analysis of global experiences in redefining the use of historical structures and equipping them for new functions are rich with insights. This research aims to examine the approach to the physicality of old buildings and the new activities of structures repurposed as churches. It seeks to extract the strategies and actions taken by studying and analyzing case studies. Thus, by reviewing global experiences in intervening in religious historical buildings, it acquires modern procedures for dealing with valuable historical edifices and presents new horizons in addressing these structures. This paper employs a descriptive-analytical method and gathers data related to eight case studies through library research and credible scientific documents, then analyzes and compares them with logical reasoning. The case studies located in various countries have been examined based on their physical and functional characteristics, new additions, and materials used. In selecting the cases, it seeks to provide a diverse range in size and the extent of intervention. The research findings indicate that considering the multiple religious, cultural, social, and economic values of churches, adopting a collaborative approach involving investors, stakeholders, local people, and experts is influential in the success of these projects. In the discussion of new additions, while maintaining the principle of distinguishing between old and new materials, the creative use of new materials and elements can aid in preserving the authenticity and integrity of the work. Paying attention to today’s needs and updating the building’s physical and functional aspects while considering their capabilities and hidden and apparent values ensures their continued existence.
Editorial: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/06/11 | Accepted: 2024/06/4 | Published: 2024/06/4
Received: 2024/06/11 | Accepted: 2024/06/4 | Published: 2024/06/4
References
1. Ahn, Y.K. (2007). Adaptive reuse of abandoned historic churches: building type and public perception (Unpublished doctoral thesis of philosophy). Texas A&M University.
2. Barou, L., Oikonomopoulou, F., Bristogianni, T., Veer, F.A. & Nijsse, R. (2018). Structural glass: A new remedial tool for the consolidation of historic structures. Heron, 63 (1/2), 159-198.
3. Brumann, C. (2017) How to Be Authentic in the UNESCO World Heritage System: Copies, Replicas, Reconstructions, and Renovations in a Global Conservation Arena. In C. Forberg, P. Stockhammer (Eds.), The Transformative Power of the Copy: A Transcultural and Interdisciplinary Approach. Heidelberg Publishing. pp. 269-287.
4. Cantell, S.F. (2005). The Adaptive Reuse of Historic Industrial Buildings: Regulation Barriers, Best Practices and Case Studies (Preprint). Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Adaptive-Reuse-of-Historic-Industrial-Barriers%2C-Cantell/afd049c24cc4a7ae628b779ba104c3deebed66cf (Accessed: 24 July 2022).
5. Ciranna, S. (2017). Building and urban space: the capability of this symbiosis or dialogue to keep the 'Spirit' of a place alive. In D. Fiorani, L. Kealy & S.F. Musso (Eds.), Conservation/ Adaptation, Keeping alive the spirit of the place - Adaptive reuse of Heritage with symbolic value. EAAE: Transactions on Architectural Education; European Association for Architectural Education. pp. 17-28.
6. Cvetanovic, A. & Momcilovic-Petronijevic, A. (2021). Contemporary meets old in rehabilitating historic buildings. Facta universitatis - series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 19 (1), 1-13. doi: 10.2298/FUACE210301002C. [DOI:10.2298/FUACE210301002C]
7. De Medici, S., De Toro, P. & Nocca, F. (2020). Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development: Impact Assessment of Two Adaptive Reuse Projects in Siracusa, Sicily. Sustainability, 12 (1), 311. doi: 10.3390/su12010311. [DOI:10.3390/su12010311]
8. Fiorani, D. (2017). Conservation and new uses in the space of the holy. In D. Fiorani, L. Kealy & S.F. Musso (Eds.), Conservation/ Adaptation, Keeping alive the spirit of the place - Adaptive reuse of Heritage with symbolic value. EAAE: Transactions on Architectural Education; European Association for Architectural Education. pp. 117-130.
9. Fiorani, D., Kealy, L. & Musso, S.F. (2017). Conservation/ Adaptation, Keeping alive the spirit of the place- Adaptive reuse of Heritage with symbolic valu. EAAE: Transactions on Architectural Education; European Association for Architectural Education.
10. Hanachi, P. & Shah-Teimouri, Y. (2022). Developing a Conceptual Framework for Adaptive Reuse in Conservation of Heritage Buildings. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 10 (19), 25-45. doi: 10.22052/jias.2022.111863
11. Harney, M. (2017). Genius Loci' Restored: The Challenge of Adaptive Reuse. In D. Fiorani, L. Kealy & S.F. Musso (Eds.), Conservation/ Adaptation, Keeping alive the spirit of the place- Adaptive reuse of Heritage with symbolic value. EAAE: Transactions on Architectural Education; European Association for Architectural Education. pp. 151-162.
12. ICOMOS. 1964. International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964). Paris, France: ICOMOS.
13. Jia, J. J., Liu, S. F., & Yang, F. (2013). Exquisite Characteristic in Peter Zumthor's Architecture Works. Applied Mechanics and Materials, (357-360), 315-318. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.357-360.315 [DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.357-360.315]
14. Karagianni, F. & Tanou, S. (2021). MoNa - Monuments in Nature: A creative coexistence. European Center of Byzantine and Post-Byzantine Monuments.
15. Khalaf, R.W. (2016). Distinguishing new architecture from old. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 7 (4), 321-339. doi: 10.1080/17567505.2016.1252492. [DOI:10.1080/17567505.2016.1252492]
16. Lueg, R. (2011). Houses of God… or not?! Approaches to the Adaptive Reuse of Churches in Germany and the United States (Unpublished master thesis of Historic Preservation). School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, University of Maryland, College Park. url: http://hdl.handle.net/1903/12120
17. Moazen, S. & Sad Berenji, S. (2023). Me'mari-ye jadid dar banaha-ye tarikhi [New Architecture in Historical Buildings]. Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University.
18. Mine, T. (2013). Adaptive re-use of monuments restoring religious buildings with different uses. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 14 (3), 14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.017]
19. Mirabella Roberti, G. (2017). The ancient church of St. Augustine as 'Aula Magna' of the University of Bergamo. In D. Fiorani, L. Kealy & S.F. Musso (Eds.), Conservation/ Adaptation, Keeping alive the spirit of the place - Adaptive reuse of Heritage with symbolic value. EAAE: Transactions on Architectural Education; European Association for Architectural Education. pp. 191-200.
20. Pimonsathean, Y. (2002). Current issues concerning adaptive re-use in the conservation of urban cultural heritage. RC: Rev. Cult., 4, 45-51.
21. Plevoets, B. & Cleempoel, K.V. (2019). Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases of an Emerging Discipline. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315161440]
22. Szuta, A.F. & Szczepanski, J. (2020). Striking elements - A lifebelt or a fad? Searching for an effective way of adapting abandoned churches. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9 (2), 277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.007. [DOI:10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.007]
23. Vellecco, I. & Martone, A. (2021). Deliverable 4.4 Case Studies of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse in the View of Circular Economy. CLIC.
24. Viollet-Le-Duc, E.-E. (1990). The Foundations of Architecture: Selections from the Dictionnaire Raisonne (K.D. Whitehead, Trans.). George Braziller. [in english]
25. Zargaran, P. (2017). Adaptive Reuse (AR) of Historical and Heritage Buildings Through Concepts of Addition and Expansion. In D. Fiorani, L. Kealy & S.F. Musso (Eds.), Conservation/ Adaptation, Keeping alive the spirit of the place - Adaptive reuse of Heritage with symbolic value. EAAE: Transactions on Architectural Education; European Association for Architectural Education. pp.351-358.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |