Volume 2, Issue 2 (6-2024)                   JORS 2024, 2(2): 22-33 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taqipour Akhtari A, Alipour Tabrizi A, Rouhanian R. Rural Area as a Place of Development, A Comparison between "Built Landscape" and "Lived Landscape" in Kohdasht Region. , JORS. 2024; 2 (2) :22-33
URL: http://jors-sj.com/article-1-33-en.html
1- Ph.D. Candidate of Comparative and Development Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2- Ph.D. Candidateof Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology,Tehran, Iran
3- M.A. Student in Landscape Architecture, School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (3574 Views)
Human, as the product of the village, is the main determinant of the formation of a place and the future development path. Among the significant concerns regarding the villages of Kuhdasht County is the extensive migration of natives. Therefore, in line with addressing the overarching theme of "the role of place in the process of rural development," the problem of this research is posed as "How is the development place in the daily life of villages in the Kuhdasht region?" Indeed, based on the assumption that "place connects human and village through mutual care pathways," the "village" is introduced as the "development place," providing a space for the daily life of human and village to achieve the "achievements" resulting from confronting unique and continuously complex hardships in the form of space. The research aims to elucidate a comprehensive model of the development place in the daily life of villages by addressing the two questions, "How is the built landscape of the village in the Kuhdasht region?" and "How is the lived landscape of the village in the Kuhdasht region?" To achieve compatibility in the "common perceived reality" of the two research questions, there is a need to compare two parallel semantic domains. This means that "descriptions of the region that are the result of observation (present)" are accounted for through thematic analysis, and "descriptions of the region that are the result of lifeworld experiences (non-present)" are accounted for through the hermeneutic phenomenology strategy, and the findings of these two steps are summarized with equal weight. The research findings revealed three dimensions: "performance," "ideology," and "assets" for the first question. In the second question, three experiences—"common birthplace," "common function," and "common assets"—were o obtained from phenomenological interviews. Finally, by comparing the results of these two stages, a model consisting of four dimensions—"place,"," "assets," "social space," and "unction"—was summarized.
Full-Text [PDF 614 kb]   (985 Downloads)    
Editorial: Original Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/06/11 | Accepted: 2024/06/4 | Published: 2024/06/4

References
1. Alipourian, J. & Rahmanifazli, A. (2023). Effective pull- Push factors on durability and rural youth migration (Case study: rural settlements of Central district of the Kouhdasht county, Lorestan Province). Modiriat-e Shahri va Roustayi, 21(69), 107-120.
2. Bagheri, R., Rezapour, D. & Ghafarinasab, E. (2019). The lived experience of women survivors of self-immolation in Kohnani district of Kohdasht city. Woman in Development & Politics, 17(2), 325-348. [DOI:10.22059/jwdp.2019.271017.1007541]
3. Blaschke, T., Merschdorf, H., Cabrera-Barona, P., Gao, S., Papadakis, E. & Kovacs-Györi, A. (2018). Place versus Space: From Points, Lines and Polygons in GIS to Place-Based Representations Reflecting Language and Culture. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(11), 452. [DOI:10.3390/ijgi7110452]
4. Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., ... & Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8086-8091. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1231332100]
5. Celis, J. E. & Gago, J. M. (2014). Shaping science policy in Europe. Molecular Oncology, 8(3), 447-457. [DOI:10.1016/j.molonc.2014.03.013]
6. Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
7. Dürrschmidt, J. (2000). Everyday Lives in the Global City: The Delinking of Locale and Milieu (1st ed.). Routledge.
8. Kazemian, G., Aslipour, H. & Taqipour Akhtari, A. (2022a). A Phenomenological study of the lived experiences of land developers in Tehran's Building Management System. Motaleate Shahri, 11(44), 31-46. [DOI:10.34785/J011.2022.002]
9. Kazemian, G., Aslipour, H., Taqipour A., A. & Alipour T., A. (2022). Urban Building Governance in Iranian Researcher's Representations: The Case Study of Tehran City. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 17(1), 5-23.
10. Khorasani, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Spatial Analysis of Rural Poverty in Kouhdasht County. Spatial Planning, 11(2), 25-48. [DOI:10.22108/SPPL.2020.120996.1462]
11. Leftwich, A. (2010). ‎States of development: on the primacy of politics in development (J. Afshar Kohan, Trans.). Pileh. (Original work published 2000) [in persian]
12. LPMPO (Lorestan Provincial Management and Planning Organization). (2023). Investigating the Development Status and Regional Imbalances of the Country's Provinces; A Case Study of Lorestan Province. Presidency; National Planning and Budget Organization. Available at: https://conference.imps.ac.ir/uploads/15_111_4_present-lorestan-14020320.pdf
13. Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: an inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Wiley.
14. Mansouri, S. A. (2023, a). Placed Nomads. MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of Landscape, 15(65), 3-3. [DOI:10.22034/MANZAR.2023.185721]
15. Mansouri, S. A. (2023, b). The Ratio of Development to the Territorial Concept. MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of Landscape, 15(64), 3-3. [DOI:10.22034/MANZAR.2023.180070]
16. Potts, D. T. (2014). Nomadism in Iran: From Antiquity to the Modern Era. Oxford Academic. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199330799.001.0001]
17. Rezagholi, A. (2022). If the North was Iranian: A Description of the History, Economy, Politics, and Culture of Iran (4th ed.). Nahadegara Publications.
18. Rezapour, D., & Bagheri, R. (2020). Analysis of the Relationship between Cooperation and Empowerment among Rural Women: A Case Study of Family-Neighborhood Qarz Al-hasaneh Funds in Tang Siab Rural District, Kuhdasht City. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 11(43), 125-159. [DOI:10.22054/qjsd.2020.52985.2001]
19. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Knopf.
20. Taqipour A, A. & Alipour T, A. (2023). An Assessment of Tehran Physical-Spatial Development Planning Laws; Using PLAF Model. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 20(118), 37-50. [DOI:10.22034/bagh.2022.315845.5047]
21. Vaghefi, I., Hajimirzaei, H., Turkmeh, A. & Jahanzad, N. (2018). Henri Lefebvre. Kasra Library Publications.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.