Volume 4, Issue 11 (2-2027)                   JORS 2027, 4(11): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


M.A. in Landscape Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, negin.rbojani@ut.ac.ir
Abstract:   (969 Views)

Problem statement: Recreational and tourism village of Goharpark in sirjan , largest village of tourism in the middle east , composed of types of recreational , residential , sports and services with sirjan 's view toward sustainable development. Golgohar in this project as a resource and potential for development should be a capacity and potential for development and park design with this extent and function should be an opportunity to promote life , but observation and analysis of the quality of the park , beyond its quantity , shows the disparities of this plan with the ideals of sustainable development and the lack of proportion to Sirjan's territory as a place.
Research objectives: In this research , firstly , it is attempted that in spite of gol- gohar investment as an opportunity to promote tourism , to pathology Goharpark by taking a fair look and in the second stage, is examined with the holistic view of why such a plan should be adopted by the managers and th next stage the impact of these decisions on the local community will be analyzed and finally, the ratio of capitalism to place and local community is analyzed.
Research method: This research is a descriptive - analytical research which is based on observation - exploratory and library observation by taking walk approach ( as a special method for landscape research).
Conclusion: pathology of Goharpark , in different dimensions ( level of planning and management, level of operational level and cognitive, level of conceptual and semantic ), because of the absence of multilateral view and understanding of sirjan 's characteristics as a territory, not merely a ground for recreation, isn’t place-based development. The study of why managers choose from managers indicates that in general, the decision to develop tourism with the aim of sustainable urban development in the service of an industry is a valuable action however , the lack of a meaningful look at the reason why this decision is taken and merely taking a symbolic design is considered to achieve developmental goals, isn’t place-based development. the study of the proportion of Goharpark with the local community shows that perhaps goharpark primarily with the “best" attributes the improvement of the mental status of the local community but its analysis in the economic , social and spatial areas indicates that pressures in the long run and in fact the absence of local community in the design. Capitalist tourism due to its potentials is an opportunity to promote the life and engine of growth , but it needs a comprehensive approach that will result in the failure to adopt such an approach rather than promoting the quality of life, destruction of place and weakening of local community.
 
Article number: 4
Full-Text [PDF 7409 kb]   (178 Downloads)    
Editorial: Original Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/04/11 | Accepted: 2026/06/13 | Published: 2026/08/23

References
1. About Gohar Park. (n.d.). Gohar Park. Retrieved from https://goharpark.ir/fa
2. Afzali, Z. (2022). An analysis in critique and review of opinions presented about the developments of Sirjan City, Iran, from its formation to the Qajar period. Athar. 42(4), 586-605. http://athar.richt.ir/article-2-904-fa.html
3. Akbari, M. R. (2018). Livable street and its role in sustainable urban tourism (case study: Valiasr Street, the section between Park Way Crossroad and Tajrish Square, Tehran) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran]. Irandoc. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/85276a015c8e1d8f9fdd327c1e80cf7f
4. Arseh Architecture and Urban Planning Consulting Engineers. (2016). بازنگری طرح توسعه و عمران (جامع) شهر سیرجان با رویکرد راهبردی [Strategic Revision of the Sirjan Comprehensive Development Plan]. Edare-ye Kol-e Rah va Shahrsazi-ye Ostan-e Kerman [General Department of Roads and Urban Development of Kerman Province]. [in Persian]
5. Ateljevic, I., Morgan, N., & Pritchard, A. (2012). The critical turn in tourism studies: Creating an academy of hope. Routledge. https://books.google.de/books?id=7PwrBgAAQBAJ
6. Augé, M. (2008). Non-places: introduction to an anathropology of supermodernity (M. Farahmand, Trans.). Iran Cultural Studies. (Original work published 1992)
7. Bianchi, R. (2018). The political economy of tourism development: A critical review. Annals of Tourism Research, 70, 88-102. [DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2017.08.005]
8. Bianchi, R. V. (2003). Place and power in tourism development: Tracing the complex articulations of community and locality. PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 1(1), 13-32. [DOI:10.25145/j.pasos.2003.01.002]
9. Britton, S. (1991). Tourism, capital, and place: Towards a critical geography of tourism. Environment and planning D: society and space, 9(4), 451-478. [DOI:10.1068/d090451]
10. Britton, S. G. (1982). The political economy of tourism in the Third World. Annals of Tourism Research, 9(3), 331-358. [DOI:10.1016/0160-7383(82)90018-4]
11. Cambridge ALD. (2006). Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Cambridge University Press.
12. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64-87. [DOI:10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64]
13. Gharib, M. (1977). A new Persian dictionary. Bonyad.
14. Golabzadeh, M. A. (2006). سیرجان خطۀ گهرنشان [Sirjan, the Region Revealing Gohar]. Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization of Kerman Province.[in Persian]
15. Halabian, A. H., Pourkhosravani, M., & Negahban, S. (2017). Assessment of tourism capabilities of Sirjan geotops using Fassoulas and Comanescu models. Researches in Earth Sciences, 8(4), 112-131. https://esrj.sbu.ac.ir/article_96452.html?lang=en
16. Heidegger, M. (2015). Building, dwelling, thinking. In A. Sharr (Ed.), Heidegger's hut (pp. 29-46). Saless Publication. (Original work published 1971)
17. MacCannell, D. (1999). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. University of California Press. https://books.google.de/books/about/The_Tourist.html?id=6V_MQzy021QC&redir_esc=y
18. Mansouri, S. A. (2023). Placed nomads. MANZAR, the Scientific Journal of Landscape, 15(65), 3. [DOI:10.22034/manzar.2023.185721]
19. Mitchell, J., & Ashley, C. (2010). Tourism and poverty reduction: pathways to prosperity. Earthscan Publications. [DOI:10.4324/9781849774635]
20. Mobbs, P. (2009). The "green-Prometheans" - better, but still a futile gesture? [ecolonomics No. 4]. http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/ecolonomics/
21. Mosedale, J. (2011). Political economy of tourism: A critical perspective. Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236881142_Political_economy_of_tourism_A_critical_perspective
22. Papoli Yazdi, M. H., & Saqal, M. (2006). Tourism (Nature & Concepts). SAMT.
23. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.
24. Sharmand Consulting Engineers. (1999). طرح جامع شهر سیرجان [Sirjan City Master Plan]. Sazman-e Maskan va Shahrsazi-ye Ostan-e Kerman[Housing and Urban Development Organization of Kerman Province]. [in Persian]
25. Sinclair, M. T., & Stabler, M. (1997). The economics of tourism. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203195437]
26. Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.